[Resolved] How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Request new features or present your ideas.
User avatar
Anomalous
Programmer
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:51 pm UTC

Re: How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Post by Anomalous »

So we need a set of decay functions. For 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, spanning from game start to the configured resource depletion time…

  • 1-t

  • cos(tπ/2)

  • 1-cos(tπ)/2

  • 1-sin(tπ/2)

etc.

Or a resource map of some sort. Mappers could create objects (non-blocking) which the engine subdivides and ‘fills’ with resources which then get depleted over time, according to distance from the resource-gathering building. Overlapping areas would be allowed, creating prime sites for mining :) If there are no resource objects then randomly fill the map, or something.

It may not be possible to mine all of the resources, so there'd have to be something like a per-team time-out (which is reset whenever resources are mined).

Debian and Ubuntu packages (squeeze, wheezy, sid; 12.04, 12.10, 13.04) may work on derivatives

OFFEND! … no, that's not right… ATTACK!

User avatar
Viech
Project Head
Posts: 2139
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:50 pm UTC
Location: Berlin

Re: How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Post by Viech »

Anomalous, you should rather post your detailed proposition of the decay function in the Resources thread. Also it seems like your decay functions are candidates for the derivate R'(t) of my resource generation rate.

Responsible for: Arch Linux package & torrent distribution, Parpax (map), Chameleon (map texture editor), Sloth (material file generator), gameplay design & programming, artistic direction

User avatar
kharnov
Granger
Posts: 1851
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:54 pm UTC
Clan: GT
Location: New York City

Re: How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Post by kharnov »

As Norfenstein stated, we've all reached a consensus that maps should not forcefully end, but should instead be dependent on resources. We now have that resources thread. If nobody minds, I'll lock this thread and mark it as resolved so that we can move on.

User avatar
janev
Marauder
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 2:45 pm UTC
Location: A hovel on Niveus

Re: How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Post by janev »

So just to be clear, how does resources running out affect the game ending?

Does the game end when one team runs out or resources regardless of people still being alive, OR does the game end when one team runs out or resources and the last man is killed OR does it end when there are no more resources to be harvested and victory goes to whoever has the upper hand, OR something else?

User avatar
Ishq
Project Head
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:32 pm UTC

Re: How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Post by Ishq »

Running out of resources has no direct effect on the game ending. Games will continue until the last man is dead.

A team without resources will, however, be severely disadvantaged as they will not be able to rebuild or repair structures.

User avatar
kharnov
Granger
Posts: 1851
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:54 pm UTC
Clan: GT
Location: New York City

Re: How, if at all, should matches forcibly end?

Post by kharnov »

Consensus has also been achieved here. Thread tagged resolved and locked. Regarding resource discussion, it should be continued in the resources thread.

Post Reply