[Resolved] How much preference should the game give to offense versus defense?

Request new features or present your ideas.
User avatar
janev
Marauder
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 2:45 pm UTC
Location: A hovel on Niveus

Re: How much preference should the game give to offense versus defense?

Post by janev »

Overall offensive play is more fun than defensive play. The benefits of defensive play should decrease the further along the game gets.

In terms of costs/benefits a team that focuses overmuch on early offensive play should lose out later in the game. The cost of early defensive play (!not camping) is that you might lose a few structures but you will have a solid foundation for the rest of the game. If on the other hand a team stays in turtle mode for too long the costs/benefits should change. They are now losing many structures and no longer gaining much of a foundation for later game stages. The weapons available should reflect that. Letting your opponent anywhere near your base late in the game should be very costly and quickly snowball.

User avatar
norfenstein
Mantis
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 1:00 pm UTC

Re: How much preference should the game give to offense versus defense?

Post by norfenstein »

I think this question is obsoleted by What is the desired pacing of the game?

User avatar
kharnov
Granger
Posts: 1851
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:54 pm UTC
Clan: GT
Location: New York City

Re: How much preference should the game give to offense versus defense?

Post by kharnov »

Agreed. If nobody objects by tomorrow, I'll lock this thread as resolved and leave a redirect to that pacing question.

Post Reply