
Previous Article
Global stability for an SEIR epidemiological model with varying infectivity and infinite delay
 MBE Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Global asymptotic properties for a LeslieGower food chain model
The relative biologic effectiveness versus linear energy transfer curve as an outputinput relation for linear cellular systems
1.  Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States 
2.  Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States 
Here we introduce a differential equation formulation for a signalandsystem model that sees cells as systems, different radiation types as input, and cellular responses as output. Because of scant knowledge of the underlying biochemical network, the current version is necessarily a work in progress. It explains the RBELET curve using not just input parameters but also systems internal state parameters. These systems internal state parameters represent parts of a biochemical network within a cell. Although multiple biochemical parts may well be involved, the shape of the RBELET curve is reproduced when only three system parameters are related to three biochemical parts: the molecular machinery for DNA double strand break repair; the molecular pathways for handling oxidative stress; and the radiolytic products of the cellular water.
Despite being a simplified ''toy model,'' changes in the systems state parameters lead to model curves that are refutable in a modern molecular biology laboratory. As the parts in the biochemical network of the radiation response are being further elucidated, this model can incorporate new systems state parameters to allow a more accurate fit.
[1] 
Howard A. Levine, YeonJung Seo, Marit NilsenHamilton. A discrete dynamical system arising in molecular biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2012, 17 (6) : 20912151. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2091 
[2] 
Eugene Kashdan, Dominique Duncan, Andrew Parnell, Heinz Schättler. Mathematical methods in systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : iii. doi: 10.3934/mbe.201606i 
[3] 
Monique Chyba, Benedetto Piccoli. Special issue on mathematical methods in systems biology. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (1) : iii. doi: 10.3934/nhm.20191i 
[4] 
N. Bellomo, A. Bellouquid. From a class of kinetic models to the macroscopic equations for multicellular systems in biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2004, 4 (1) : 5980. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.59 
[5] 
Judith R. Miller, Huihui Zeng. Stability of traveling waves for systems of nonlinear integral recursions in spatial population biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2011, 16 (3) : 895925. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.895 
[6] 
Avner Friedman. Conservation laws in mathematical biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (9) : 30813097. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3081 
[7] 
Jacky Cresson, Bénédicte Puig, Stefanie Sonner. Stochastic models in biology and the invariance problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2016, 21 (7) : 21452168. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016041 
[8] 
Avner Friedman. PDE problems arising in mathematical biology. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 691703. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.691 
[9] 
Avner Friedman. Free boundary problems arising in biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2018, 23 (1) : 193202. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018013 
[10] 
Heiko Enderling, Alexander R.A. Anderson, Mark A.J. Chaplain, Glenn W.A. Rowe. Visualisation of the numerical solution of partial differential equation systems in three space dimensions and its importance for mathematical models in biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (4) : 571582. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.571 
[11] 
F. R. Guarguaglini, R. Natalini. Global existence and uniqueness of solutions for multidimensional weakly parabolic systems arising in chemistry and biology. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (1) : 287309. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.287 
[12] 
Charles Wiseman, M.D.. Questions from the fourth son: A clinician reflects on immunomonitoring, surrogate markers and systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 279287. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.279 
[13] 
Yejuan Wang, Lijuan Zhang, Yuan Yuan. Tempered fractional order compartment models and applications in biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021275 
[14] 
Erika T. Camacho, Christopher M. KribsZaleta, Stephen Wirkus. The mathematical and theoretical biology institute  a model of mentorship through research. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 13511363. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1351 
[15] 
Qingdao Huang, Hong Qian. The dynamics of zerothorder ultrasensitivity: A critical phenomenon in cell biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2011, 4 (6) : 14571464. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1457 
[16] 
Patrizia Daniele, Cristinca Fulga, Guiomar MartínHerrán, Vladimir Mazalov, Leon Petrosyan, Bruno M. P. M. Oliveira, Carlos Ramos, GerhardWilhelm Weber, Nikolay Zenkevich. Foreword: Special Issue "EURO 2019: Games in economics, finance and biology". Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021, 8 (2) : iiv. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021016 
[17] 
Adam Peddle, William Lee, Tuoi Vo. Modelling chemistry and biology after implantation of a drugeluting stent. Part Ⅱ: Cell proliferation. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 11171135. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018050 
[18] 
Edward J. Allen. Derivation and computation of discretedelay and continuousdelay SDEs in mathematical biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (3) : 403425. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.403 
[19] 
Hinke M. Osinga, Arthur Sherman, Krasimira TsanevaAtanasova. Crosscurrents between biology and mathematics: The codimension of pseudoplateau bursting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (8) : 28532877. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2853 
[20] 
John D. Nagy. The Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Cancer: A Review of Mathematical Models of Necrosis and Tumor Cell Diversity. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (2) : 381418. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.381 
2018 Impact Factor: 1.313
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]