Search found 1591 matches

by kharnov
Fri Dec 25, 2015 6:27 pm UTC
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: MERRY CHRISTMAS
Replies: 2
Views: 5355

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Image

by kharnov
Tue Dec 08, 2015 11:59 pm UTC
Forum: Animations
Topic: Battlesuit
Replies: 85
Views: 980928

Re: Battlesuit

He said to ping you. What are we waiting on from him?

by kharnov
Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:41 am UTC
Forum: Animations
Topic: Battlesuit
Replies: 85
Views: 980928

Re: Battlesuit

Ping. What is going on with the suit?

by kharnov
Thu Dec 03, 2015 5:19 am UTC
Forum: Community
Topic: Zilla !
Replies: 1
Views: 9947

Re: Zilla !

:thumbup:

by kharnov
Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:46 pm UTC
Forum: Off-topic
Topic: Soon
Replies: 4
Views: 21314

Re: Soon

:cyclops:

by kharnov
Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:27 pm UTC
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: SITE UPGRADE
Replies: 19
Views: 36293

Re: SITE UPGRADE

We now have cu-kai as our official Web Raccoon:

Image

Please dump all of your website-related fixes/requests/raccoon treats on him.

by kharnov
Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:29 am UTC
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Re-licensing the wiki (without the non-commercial clause)
Replies: 34
Views: 65693

Re: Re-licensing the wiki (without the non-commercial clause)

Do you really think an NC clause will stop a scummy site like that? I doubt they even notice there's a license half the time.

by kharnov
Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:59 pm UTC
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Re-licensing the wiki (without the non-commercial clause)
Replies: 34
Views: 65693

Re: Re-licensing the wiki (without the non-commercial clause)

I recall Calinou didn't want the NC clause, as well as several others whose names escape me.

by kharnov
Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:43 am UTC
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Re-licensing the wiki (without the non-commercial clause)
Replies: 34
Views: 65693

Re: Re-licensing the wiki (without the non-commercial clause)

velociostrich wrote:

Then, of course, there's whether anyone actually cares; scammers gonna scam anyway, and if removing -NC makes people happier and more likely to contribute, then sure, I'm in. Thoughts?

That's more or less the idea I'm operating off of, here.