Searching for more code reviews

Release and discuss things you've made, including mods.
User avatar
velociostrich
Dragoon
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:24 pm UTC

Re: Searching for more code reviews

Post by velociostrich »

gavlig wrote:

@Viech: QtCreator works fine as IDE for unv. Just load it from CMakeLists.txt and you have a ready-to-go project ;)

Qrntz wrote:

Qt Creator to both or Vim with extensions if you're feeling hardcore.

Qrntz, I swear on IRC you told me that QtCreator only works with C++! I just tried it and from first glance it looks a helluva lot nicer on the eyes than Code::Blocks.

User avatar
Qrntz
Dragoon
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Chornobyl
Contact:

Re: Searching for more code reviews

Post by Qrntz »

velociostrich wrote:

Qrntz, I swear on IRC you told me that QtCreator only works with C++!

  1. I told you it would highlight the syntax and support most of the IDE functionality, but wasn't meant to edit C code;

  2. That was some versions ago, now the support is quite fine. :-p

velociostrich wrote:

I just tried it and from first glance it looks a helluva lot nicer on the eyes than Code::Blocks.

Granted.

Viech wrote:

I used grep and vim before but tracking function calls between files was rather tedious (is there a plugin that makes this easier?).

Qrntz wrote:

Vim with extensions

There are lots of docs on that. Juggle plugins until you find the optimal configuration. My personal small recommendation list would be:

When I need to use a tag facility, I use Exuberant Ctags that Vim natively supports.

Image

Post Reply